The Real AI Race Isn't About Models or Data. It's About Context.
Every company I talk to right now is convinced they have an AI problem.
Every company I talk to right now is convinced they have an AI problem. Their AI writes emails nobody responds to. It researches accounts and surfaces leads the sales team already closed six months ago. Finger-numbing sessions copying and pasting between tools generate content that sounds exactly like what every competitor is publishing. Leaders invest in tool after tool, run training session after training session, and still find themselves staring at the same question: why isn’t AI actually moving the needle? Here’s what you’re not being told. The problem is not your model. The problem is not your data. The problem is context: the specific knowledge of your business, your customers and what they need right now, and how your team actually works. It is also the hardest problem to solve, and the one the industry has been slowest to address. Here is the distinction that I think is getting lost. Data is what happened. Context provides meaning around real events, what they mean, why they matter, and what to do about it. Context is not a feature; it is necessary infrastructure. Your CRM has a record that a deal closed eighteen months ago. That is data. Context is knowing the deal closed because your champion switched companies, the pricing had to be adjusted three times before it landed, and that customer now refers several new deals a year and hates being contacted by automation. A human who worked that account knows all of this. Almost no AI does, because almost no platform is built to capture it. This is the gap. Not a model gap. Not a data gap. A context gap. And it is the problem HubSpot is solving with the Agentic Customer Platform. When Yamini introduced our Agentic Customer Platform earlier this year, she described the foundation underneath it: one place where all your customer data and business context lives, available to your team and your AI agents at the moment they need it. The best infrastructure is invisible. It runs in the background, stays current as your business changes, and doesn’t make your team repeat themselves. That is the standard AI should be held to, and almost never meets. There is a cost your team pays every single day that does not show up in your AI budget. We call it the briefing tax: the time and repetition required to give AI enough background to produce something useful. You explain your brand voice before you ask it to write. You paste in the account history before you ask it to research. You describe your pricing structure, your competitor landscape, your customer profile, before every meaningful task. And the next day, you do it again. It does not learn your business. The real cost isn’t the hours your team loses to re-briefing AI, it’s the opportunity cost: the insights AI could have surfaced if it actually knew your business. The briefing tax is just the daily friction. The harder problem is the one you don’t see: what happens to context over time. Your competitive positioning changes. Your ideal customer profile shifts. Your playbook gets updated. Your AI does not know any of that. It is not that it forgot. It has memory of the conversation. It just has no connection to the business behind it. For GTM teams, this looks like AI that is confidently wrong. A project changes, your team adjusts, but AI keeps drawing on outdated context. Outputs start to sound off. Recommendations no longer fit your goals. When your AI isn’t connected to the full picture, it can never develop the complete, dynamic knowledge it needs to create genuine value. It stays a tool. It never becomes a trusted teammate. Not all context is created equal. Personal AI tools like ChatGPT are building personal context: your preferences, your conversation history, your communication style. Enterprise tools like Glean are building organizational context: your documents, wikis, and institutional knowledge. At HubSpot, we are building Growth Context: The rich, high-quality, and precise understanding AI needs to drive outcomes across marketing, sales, and customer success. This isn’t a concept. We’re building real infrastructure that will mean we’ll both capture and maintain this context for customers, while also giving them the ability to self-manage. We view Growth Context as having five dimensions: If you are evaluating AI for your team, the questions that actually matter are not about the model. Models are increasingly commoditized. The right questions are about context. Answer “no” to any of these, and your AI isn’t working with your business, it operates on a version of your business that no longer exists. That is the real AI race. The companies that get Growth Context right do not just use AI better. They get further ahead every time they use it.Context is the Infrastructure, Not the Feature
The Hidden Cost of Context Gaps
Growth Teams Need Their Own Context

What the Right Questions Look Like
ValVades